Just because they are rumors, does not make them lies!

By: Marwan Arikat • Just because they are rumors, does not make them lies! • I. The rumors about possible relocation of Hamas leadership, from Syria to Qatar are based on actual facts on the ground: • A. Members of the Hamas political structure in Gaza have expressed discontent with the war crimes committed by the Assad Régime against Sunni Muslims, especially the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, because Hamas happens to be a Member of the global Muslim Brotherhood movement. • B. Hamas leadership in Gaza did not approve of the recent support for the Assad Régime by the Hamas leadership in Damascus. • C. Hamas in Gaza refused the Iranian interference in Syrian Affairs, despite the fact that Iran provides rhetorical, political and some armed support to Hamas. • D. The contradiction, regarding Syrian oppressive crackdown of the "Sunni" uprising, between the Hamas leadership in Gaza and the Hamas leadership in Damascus, led to minor friction between the two entities. • E. The Syrian intelligence is trying to silence Hamas in Gaza by declaring some members as persona non grata(non-welcome persons.) • F. The Syrian Régime have made it clear that Hamas should relocate from Damascus to somewhere else for two reasons: • 1. The Syrian Régime feels betrayed by Hamas because Hamas did not echo the Syrian propaganda that the Syrian civil unrest was caused by foreign elements, and has nothing to due with the brutality of Assad's régime. • 2. The Syrian Régime is desperately trying to appease the American, in order to alleviate the international pressure on the régime to stop the genocide against the people of Syria. • II. Hamas leadership, especially in Gaza, always expressed that resistance is on the side of the oppressed, even if it meant alienating Hamas allies, thus proving that Hamas is a proxy to no one: • A. Hamas siding with the opressed, regardless of who are the oppressors: • 1. Hamas in Gaza publicly condemned the massacres committed by Iran's allies in Iraq against Palestinian refugees in Iraq and Iraqi Sunnis, Hamas condemned the extremist Al-Mahdi (Arab) Shiite militia and the persian-run, Bader Bigade who happen to be the Iranian Arm in Iraq. Risking offending the Ayatollah's Régime. • 2. Other examples of anti-Iranian rhetoric by Hamas in Gaza: • a. Hamas in Gaza condemned the execution of saddam hussein by the Shiite Sectarian Régime. • b. Hamas in Gaza condemned the murder of bin laden, another "nemesis " of Iran. • B. Hamas caused an embarrassment to Hizbollah (another resistance movement), by exposing Hizbollah's hypocrisy. Hizbollah supported the Shiite revolution against the Bahraini régime, however, Nasrallah's organization not only failed to condemn the Syrian Régime, on the contrary, Hizbollah echoed Assad's propaganda that the innocent people who were killed by Bashar's ruthless brother, Maher Assad, were Zionist & Saudi agents, including the children who were tortured by Assad's secret police in Dera'a, the incident that ignited the Syrian revolution

Just because they are rumors, does not make them lies!

By: Marwan Arikat "Hamas Relocation" - Just because they are rumors, does not make them lies!    - I. The rumors about possible relocation of Hamas leadership, from      Syria to Qatar are based on actual facts on the ground:        - A. Members of the Hamas political structure in Gaza have          expressed discontent with the war crimes committed by the          Assad Régime against Sunni Muslims, especially the Muslim          Brotherhood in Syria, because Hamas happens to be a Member of          the global Muslim Brotherhood movement.        - B. Hamas leadership in Gaza did not approve of the recent          support for the Assad Régime by the  Hamas leadership in          Damascus.        - C. Hamas in Gaza refused the Iranian interference  in Syrian          Affairs, despite the fact that Iran provides rhetorical,          political and some armed support to Hamas.        - D. The contradiction, regarding Syrian oppressive crackdown of          the "Sunni" uprising, between the Hamas leadership in Gaza          and the Hamas leadership in Damascus, led to minor friction          between the two entities.        - E. The Syrian intelligence is trying to silence Hamas in Gaza by          declaring some members as persona non grata(non-welcome          persons.)        - F. The Syrian Régime have made it clear that Hamas should          relocate from Damascus to somewhere else for two reasons:            - 1. The Syrian Régime feels betrayed by Hamas because Hamas              did not echo the Syrian propaganda that the Syrian civil              unrest was caused by foreign elements, and has nothing to              do with the brutality of Assad's régime.            - 2. The Syrian Régime is desperately trying to appease the              Americans, in order to alleviate the international              pressure on the régime to stop the genocide against the              people of Syria.    - II. Hamas leadership, especially in Gaza, always expressed that they support      resistance and they are ip on the side of the oppressed, even if it meant      alienating Hamas allies, thus proving that Hamas is a proxy to no      one:        - A. Hamas siding with the opressed, regardless of who are the          oppressors:            - 1. Hamas in Gaza publicly condemned the massacres committed              by Iran's allies in Iraq against Palestinian refugees in              Iraq and Iraqi Sunnis, Hamas condemned the extremist              Al-Mahdi (Arab) Shiite militia and the persian-run, Bader              Brigade who happen to be the Iranian Arm in Iraq. Risking              offending the Ayatollah's Régime.            - 2.  Other examples of anti-Iranian rhetoric by Hamas in Gaza:                - a. Hamas in Gaza condemned the execution of Saddam                  Hussein by the Shiite Sectarian Régime.                - b. Hamas in Gaza condemned the murder of bin laden,                  another "nemesis " of Iran.        - B. Hamas caused an embarrassment to Hizbollah (another          resistance movement), by exposing Hizbollah's hypocrisy.          Hizbollah  supported the Shiite revolution against the          Bahraini régime, however, Nasrallah's organization not only          failed to condemn the Syrian Régime, on the contrary,          Hizbollah echoed Assad's propaganda that the innocent people          who were killed by Bashar's ruthless brother, Maher Assad,          were Zionist & Saudi agents, including the children who were          tortured by Assad's secret police in Dera'a, the incident          that ignited the Syrian revolution

“And The Rowaibeidah Have spoken”

قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: “سيأتي على الناس سنوات خداعات يصدق فيها الكاذب و يكذب فيها الصادق و يؤتمن فيها الخائن و يخون فيها الأمين و ينطق فيها الرويبضة قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة.” و ينطق فيها الرويبضة قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة. وونطق الروبيضة سيأتي على الناس سنوات خداعات يصدق فيها الكاذب و يكذب فيها الصادق و يؤتمن فيها الخائن و يخون فيها الأمين. و ينطق فيها الرويبضة. قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة. The Messenger of Allah ( Prayer and Peace Be Upon Him) said: Cunning years will come upon people, where the liar will be believed and the honest person  will be disbelieved. And the Treacherous will be trusted and the Trustworthy will be mistrusted. And the Rowaibeidah shall speak(publicly & with authority). The Prophet was asked: what is the Rowaibeidah? He answered: The silly, ignorant(Lacking knowledge or awareness or insight) man speaking(as an authority and an expert) in matters that are of concern (highly critical) to  the public (welfare.) “And The Rowaibeidah Have spoken” According to a Wikileaked US cable and titled KING AND QUEEN[Of Jordan] OUTLINE IRANIAN “NEMESIS”, the Royal couple Spoke to members of a delegation of staffers from the U.S. Senate. They stressed the threat Iran poses to security and stability in the region, and linked the “Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the rise of Iranian influence in the region.” ( I guess the Iranian Régime, which did not exist in 1948 or 1967, is behind the Israeli occupation of Palestine.) The King asserted that a collapse of the peace process would strengthen Iran’s hand( So the ultimate objective of the the so-called Peace Process is to weaken Iran, Justice for Palestinian is irrelevant here, so the real Mideast Conflict is Tehran, not Jerusalem, based.) The Queen added that economically strong, politically moderate alternatives in the region are the only thing that will ultimately defeat Iran’s influence.( So is The presence of an Israelis Zionist, Arab & Muslim-Hating Fanatic Régime, which is Nuclearly armed to the teeth, the moderate alternative for Iran’s “influence”?) The King stated”Failure (of the peace talks)will give Iran and its proxies exactly what they’re looking for,” (He failed to mention that any success for Iran and its “proxies” means a defeat for American/Israeli “proxies including, the King himself.”) The King stressed that we should “connect the dots” between regional stability and Iranian influence( while, The dots of the existence of the Zionist Régime and the region’s instability should not be connected) and avoid compartmentalizing(Big Psychological Word for the King of Jordan) Iran, Iraq and the peace process. (yet, It is OK to compartmentalize US aid for Jordan, Jordan being an oppressive dictatorship & Jordan being a border guard for Israel and a big Refugee camp to hold Palestinians.) The King said failure on the peace process would make Iran even more aggressive, compel a Sunni Arab response, and thus deepen conflict in Lebanon and Iraq. ( Failure at a “peace-process” will actually make the masses of the Arab world (especially Palestinians) more outspoken against their Régimes, specifically The Jordanian Monarchy , and compel the Jordanian Monarchy and other American/Israeli proxies in the region to act with brutality toward their people, which will increase civil unrest and threaten the Jordanian Monarchy’s existence. It is an insult to basic human intelligence to Project(another Psychological Word the King seem to have forgotten) the real instability caused by the Israeli presence in the Arab world, to the unrealistic and over-exaggerated (although for the Iranian leadership they are true ambitions) “Persian Threat.”

"And The Rowaibeidah Have spoken"

قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: "سيأتي على الناس سنوات خداعات يصدق فيها الكاذب و يكذب فيها الصادق و يؤتمن فيها الخائن و يخون فيها الأمين و ينطق فيها الرويبضة قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة." و ينطق فيها الرويبضة قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة. وونطق الروبيضة سيأتي على الناس سنوات خداعات يصدق فيها الكاذب و يكذب فيها الصادق و يؤتمن فيها الخائن و يخون فيها الأمين. و ينطق فيها الرويبضة. قيل: وما الرويبضة؟ قال: الرجل التافه يتكلم في أمر العامة. The Messenger of Allah ( Prayer and Peace Be Upon Him) said: Cunning years will come upon people, where the liar will be believed and the honest person  will be disbelieved. And the Treacherous will be trusted and the Trustworthy will be mistrusted. And the Rowaibeidah shall speak(publicly & with authority). The Prophet was asked: what is the Rowaibeidah? He answered: The silly, ignorant(Lacking knowledge or awareness or insight) man speaking(as an authority and an expert) in matters that are of concern (highly critical) to  the public (welfare.) "And The Rowaibeidah Have spoken" According to a Wikileaked US cable and titled KING AND QUEEN[Of Jordan] OUTLINE IRANIAN "NEMESIS", the Royal couple Spoke to members of a delegation of staffers from the U.S. Senate. They stressed the threat Iran poses to security and stability in the region, and linked the "Israeli-Palestinian conflict to the rise of Iranian influence in the region." ( I guess the Iranian Régime, which did not exist in 1948 or 1967, is behind the Israeli occupation of Palestine.) The King asserted that a collapse of the peace process would strengthen Iran's hand( So the ultimate objective of the the so-called Peace Process is to weaken Iran, Justice for Palestinian is irrelevant here, so the real Mideast Conflict is Tehran, not Jerusalem, based.) The Queen added that economically strong, politically moderate alternatives in the region are the only thing that will ultimately defeat Iran's influence.( So is The presence of an Israelis Zionist, Arab & Muslim-Hating Fanatic Régime, which is Nuclearly armed to the teeth, the moderate alternative for Iran's "influence"?) The King stated"Failure (of the peace talks)will give Iran and its proxies exactly what they're looking for," (He failed to mention that any success for Iran and its "proxies" means a defeat for American/Israeli "proxies including, the King himself.") The King stressed that we should "connect the dots" between regional stability and Iranian influence( while, The dots of the existence of the Zionist Régime and the region's instability should not be connected) and avoid compartmentalizing(Big Psychological Word for the King of Jordan) Iran, Iraq and the peace process. (yet, It is OK to compartmentalize US aid for Jordan, Jordan being an oppressive dictatorship & Jordan being a border guard for Israel and a big Refugee camp to hold Palestinians.) The King said failure on the peace process would make Iran even more aggressive, compel a Sunni Arab response, and thus deepen conflict in Lebanon and Iraq. ( Failure at a "peace-process" will actually make the masses of the Arab world (especially Palestinians) more outspoken against their Régimes, specifically The Jordanian Monarchy , and compel the Jordanian Monarchy and other American/Israeli proxies in the region to act with brutality toward their people, which will increase civil unrest and threaten the Jordanian Monarchy's existence. It is an insult to basic human intelligence to Project(another Psychological Word the King seem to have forgotten) the real instability caused by the Israeli presence in the Arab world, to the unrealistic and over-exaggerated (although for the Iranian leadership they are true ambitions) "Persian Threat."

Libyans vs. Gaddafi

Libyans vs. Gaddafi By: Marwan Arikat Revolutionaries took control of many of the cities in east of the country of Lybia, including Benghazi, which saw celebrations in the streets of the city, at a time when violent clashes erupted in the capital Tripoli, where pro-Gaddafi troops were still trying  to tighten the grip of the psychopathic dictator on the city. This comes after the announcement of Libya's interior minister, Maj. Gen. Abdul-Fattah Younis al-Obaidi, his resignation from all his posts, underscoring the  clear defiance to Gaddafi, by the Libyan military leaders and diplomats,  who made it perfectly clear that neither the Libyan military nor the civil servants, are willing to side with Gaddafi's homicidal Régime. Furthermore, they refused to take any part  in massacring  their own people to appease the madman in tripoli and his corrupt family. Maj. Gen . Al-Obaidi, who used to be known as the righthand man of Gaddaffi, called on the armed forces to join the demonstrators  and respond to the demand of the people, military leaders also  refused to take any part in the 'blood-bath', that Gaddafi's son, 'Saif al-Islam', threatened the protesters with, if they don't discontinueً the demonstrations against his father. In addition to the military and the diplomatic corp switching their allegiance to the demonstrators, a number of tribes in the country withdrew their allegiance to Colonel Gaddafi during subsequent criticism and international condemnation for the regime use of brutal force to suppress the demonstrators, killing hundreds of the protestors. In a tribal society, such as Libya , the powerful tribes are significant to any change in the country, because most region in Libya are controlled by tribes, including areas rich with oil and natural gas, that is why one of the major tribes that control oil-rich areas, threatened to cut off oil and gas supplies to Europe and the world, if the international community does not pressure Muammar Gaddafi and his corrupt regime to step down and deliver the rule of Libya to the revolutionaries.

Mid-East Leaders' Attachments To The Ruling Seat

When watching the Arab recent Revolution; you will notice that the longer the régime has been in power, the more likely for the régime to fight more brutally for his leadership position. For example, the president of Tunisia, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali Who became president in 1987, has abandoned his position without much of a fight. While Egypt's Mubarak, who became president in 1981, had to hope that the largest populated Arab Country Will blink first in the battle between the revolutionaries and the security forces, however, after the massacres around the country, Mubarak resigned. In Libya, the situation is different, after 42 years of rule, it seems that Muammar al-Gaddafi has grown very attached to the seat of power. That is why Qaddafi's son has warned the opposition that if they keep up the protests, then they should expect bloodbaths. Thus, the removal of the Hashemite régime in Jordan, which existed since the Balfour Declaration in 1917, Will prove the most difficult to change and may cost the people of Jordan half of their population.

The Revolution Of Manama And The Secret Saudi War Against The Shiites

By: Marwan Arikat Shiite Muslims Comprises More Than Half Of The Population Of Bahrain. However, They Are Considered Second Class Citizens. Even Though, Religious Affiliation Is Not The Top Reason Young People Are Taking To the Streets In Manama And Other Bahraini Cities; The Saudi Support For The Brutal Crackdown Of The Bahraini Security Forces, Proves That Saudi Arabia Is Worried That The Events In Bahrain, Which Is Geographically Close To Saudi Arabia, Might Spread And trigger Instability In The Eastern Province Of Saudi Arabia, Which Is Predominantly inhabited by Shiites. Moreover, There Are Some circulating Rumors That Saudi Special Forces, Are Providing Military And Tactical Support To The Bahraini Army And Police Forces to combat the demonstrations. On The Other Hand, The Saudi Meddling In Bahraini Affairs Has Fired-back, And According To Reuters, "Saudi Shi'ites have held a small protest in the kingdom's oil-producing eastern province, close to Gulf Arab neighbour Bahrain where unrest has cost six lives, local Shi'ite sources said on Saturday. They said a group of Shi'ites staged a protest on Thursday in the town of Awwamiya, near the Saudi Shi'ite centre of Qatif on the Gulf coast, to demand the release of fellow Shi'ites held in prison without trial.Top OPEC exporter Saudi Arabia fears that unrest in Bahrain, where majority Shi'ites are protesting against the Sunni government, might spread to its Shi'ite minority who mostly live in the eastern province, the source of Saudi oil wealth." Saudi Arabia Has Been Acting As A Pariah State And a Source Of Instability In Th Region, Since It Involved Its Troops To Fight The Houthi Shiite Rebels On Behalf Of The Corrupt Yemeni Government In Sann'a, And The Saudi Army Changed The Course Of The Battle, By Using He Hightech Weapons Supplied By The US Against The Lightly Armed Houthi Rebels, Who Were Defeating The Yemeni Army, By Using Guerilla Style Fighting. In Lebanon, Saudi Arabia Tried To Impose Its Will On The Lebanese People, To Push For The Disarmament Of The Resistence Groups In Southen Lebanon, who Happen To Be Shiites. Lastly But Not Least, The Wikileaks Exposed How Saudi Arabia Was The Lead Proponent Of A US Military Action Against Iran. I Think The Saudi Hostile Policy Toward Iran (the Protector Of The Shiites) Is Foolish And Misguided, Because Iran Is Not Bahrain Or Yemen. Iran Is A regional Superpower That Constitues A Threat To The All Mighty US Troops In The Persian Gulf And The State Of Isreal. Thus, Saudi Arabia Is Small Potatoes To the Islamic Repuplic Of Iran, And Iran Does Not Need To Fight Saudi Arabia In Order To Destiblize The Saudi Royal Family. All Iran Needs To Do Is To Incite The Shiite Population In The Saudi Oil Rich Eastern Province Against The Saudi Royal Regime. Consequently, It Will Be A Good Lesson For The Saudi Ruling Famlly To Avoid Antagonizing The Iranian Regime, Which Is More Resourceful Than The Saudi Leadership And Is Capable Of Setting The Collapse Of The Saudi Regime In Motion.